
Takibi Base Shared Knowledge Base: Cited Retrieval
Takibi Base shared knowledge base gives AI agents scoped document access and cited passages. Compare its €18 and €52 plans,…

Endtest test automation turns a plain-English scenario or browser recording into a cloud-run web or mobile test with editable steps, then lets teams rerun those checks across browsers. It suits QA and engineering teams that want a faster starting point without giving up review of the test logic. Starter costs $175 per month; the service is paid, with a seven-day free trial described in its terms.
| Detail | Verified information |
|---|---|
| Pricing model | Paid subscription; Starter from $175/month |
| Platform | Web dashboard; tests web and mobile applications |
| Best for | QA and engineering teams building repeatable end-to-end checks |
| Free tier | No; the terms describe a 7-day trial |
| Last verified | October 7, 2026 |
Last updated: October 7, 2026.
Endtest is a hosted test-automation service for teams that need to check user journeys in web or mobile apps. Its AI Test Creation Agent accepts a goal in natural language, examines the target application in a browser, and generates a test with steps, assertions and locators. A browser recording can also provide the starting point, and the service says imported test files can be converted into Endtest tests.
Generated output remains editable in the Endtest editor. A team can change a step, add variables and rerun it. The product is intended to host an ongoing suite, execute it in the cloud, and help maintain it when an interface changes.
Natural-language creation with an editable result. A tester can describe a flow such as signing up, confirming an email and changing a subscription. Endtest says its agent plans the actions, operates the browser and returns concrete steps and assertions. The generated test can be inspected and revised before it becomes part of the suite. Teams still need to define what a correct result looks like; the prompt alone cannot supply product requirements.
Real-browser, parallel coverage. The official product pages list Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge and Internet Explorer, with web runs on Windows and macOS machines. The cross-browser feature runs selected combinations in parallel. Pricing distinguishes the available parallel slots: Starter lists one to five, Pro two to five, and Enterprise six or more. That capacity matters for teams with a large regression pack.
Maintenance and failure evidence. Endtest's self-healing feature checks nearby element attributes, text and page structure when a locator stops matching. The product says it logs the old and replacement locator, giving reviewers something specific to inspect. When a run fails, its pages describe video, screenshots, console and network information, plus reproduction steps. These artifacts can shorten diagnosis, but a green run is not proof that a changed workflow still reflects intended product behavior.
CI/CD and adjacent test types. The homepage describes CI/CD integration, while the pricing matrix lists web and mobile testing and separates premium capabilities such as accessibility, API, email and SMS tests. The precise feature mix varies by plan, so confirm the needed combination before budgeting. Endtest also says it can import tests from Selenium, Playwright and Cypress, which may help teams evaluate migration without rewriting everything at once.
Endtest suits QA teams that repeat multi-step journeys across browsers and want a hosted place to author, execute and inspect them. It may also fit product managers or designers who can describe user behavior but do not write test frameworks. Editable steps keep a person in the loop.
Starter costs $175/month with 30-day result retention; Pro is $450/month with 90 days. The official security overview separately says test logs remain accessible for 30 days; ask how that relates to plan-level retention before relying on a long audit trail. The privacy policy page is dated March 4, 2022. The security overview recommends sanitized or synthetic data and says real user PII or PHI is not required. Teams handling regulated data should confirm current contract and retention terms directly.
Skip this if you have only a few stable checks, prefer full control over a code-first test framework, or cannot justify a recurring $175 entry plan. Self-healing can change a locator after a UI shift, so inspect its replacement log before using a passing run as a release gate.
The official Endtest pricing page lists monthly prices as follows, verified October 2026:
| Plan | Price | Parallel tests | Test-result retention |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $175/month | 1–5 | 30 days |
| Pro | $450/month | 2–5 | 90 days |
| Endtest Enterprise | Custom | 6+ | Custom |
The pricing matrix lists unlimited test executions, test creation, users and AI across plans. The public cards invite visitors to try Starter or Pro for free, and the Terms of Service describe a seven-day trial. The terms also say subscriptions can renew automatically unless renewal is disabled. Although they mention monthly or annual billing, the public pricing page does not show an annual price. Check the live plan details before committing.
Pros
- Tests can start from plain-language scenarios or browser recordings, and generated steps stay editable.
- Real-browser cross-browser runs, parallel execution and failure artifacts give QA teams a review trail.
- Imports from Selenium, Playwright and Cypress can make a pilot easier for teams with existing suites.
Cons
- Starter at $175/month is a meaningful floor; there is a trial, not a permanent free plan.
- Self-healing can alter a locator after a UI change, so reviewers should inspect the change log instead of treating every passing run as equivalent.
- The security page's 30-day log-access statement and the pricing page's 90-day Pro result-retention figure need clarification; the privacy policy is dated March 2022.
For a second quality layer, Panel Review AI Code Review addresses code-change review, not browser execution. Teams browsing coding tools, business tools or productivity tools can compare adjacent workflows; none replaces checking the actual app journey.
These are code-first paths, not drop-in replacements for Endtest's hosted natural-language authoring. The better fit depends on whether the team values a managed authoring and execution layer or direct control over test code and runtime.
Endtest automates end-to-end checks for web and mobile applications. Teams can describe a scenario in plain English or record a browser journey, then inspect and edit generated steps before running them in the cloud. It also provides execution artifacts that help developers investigate failed runs.
Endtest positions its test editor as no-code or low-code and lets users describe a flow in natural language or record it in a browser. Generated steps can be edited in the product. Teams still need to define expected outcomes, manage test data and review changes; the AI agent does not replace QA judgment.
The public pricing page lists paid Starter and Pro subscriptions and invites users to try them for free; it does not list a continuing free tier. Endtest's Terms of Service describe a seven-day trial. Check the signup flow before relying on the trial, because its included capabilities may differ from a paid plan.
As verified in October 2026, Starter is $175 per month and Pro is $450 per month. Enterprise pricing is custom. The listed parallel-test ranges are one to five for Starter, two to five for Pro and six or more for Enterprise; confirm plan entitlements before purchase.
The pricing page lists 30 days of result retention for Starter, 90 days for Pro and custom retention for Enterprise. Separately, the security overview says test logs remain accessible for 30 days. Ask Endtest which artifacts each period covers before depending on Pro for a longer audit history.
Pricing model: Free TrialPaid Detailed plans are not listed yet, so check the official website for current prices.
Visit the official website to try this tool.
Visit Website → for Endtest Test Automation Review: Editable AI Steps (official site, opens in a new tab)
Takibi Base shared knowledge base gives AI agents scoped document access and cited passages. Compare its €18 and €52 plans,…

Moblers AI Product Factory development pairs AI planning with senior engineers for scoped 30-day MVPs, with QA, security controls and…

Digital Interview AI mock interviews pair adaptive practice with debriefs; free users get 20 audio minutes, and paid plans add…

Nainly review: compare resume rewriting and managed outreach, check custom pricing and data sharing, and see if the service fits…

GPT-6.1 Sol is OpenAI’s paid model for coding, computer use and professional workflows. Learn about access, API pricing and trade-offs.

Panel Review AI code review adds four-model checks before risky code ships, with local gates, eight agent surfaces and a…
Explore the official website and see what it can do.
Visit Website → for Endtest Test Automation Review: Editable AI Steps (official site, opens in a new tab)